Re: !st Trimester Screening For Downs

From: Gary (jafar6@optonline.net)
Mon Feb 9 18:52:43 2004


--Boundary_(ID_vXdc9XTcjtUo39aEp0lXdg) Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

Lynn,

I am suprised by that statement too. I wasn't at the meeting and would have found such a remark to be upsetting. My interpretation is that the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine is trying to develop guidelines and no one else can be qualified to follow their guidelines since they have not been published or shared. The truth is, that I really don't know what he meant, so maybe I shouldn't comment. I think the cat is out of the bag. Few of us are going to wait for the Society's guidelines before offering this service.

Such an elitist tone reminds me of my first encounter with the FMF Theoretical Course and the lab sponsoring it. I wondered how those impeccably dressed world travelers balanced effortlessly on their pedestals.

--
Gary Kleinman
MFM, Genetics
Bridgeport, CT

On Monday, February 9, 2004, at 11:20 AM, Lynn D. Montgomery, M.D. wrote:

> > Gary, > I totally agree with all of your points.  I was at the meeting and > amazingly enough, nothing was mentioned at the time of questioning > with regard to qualifications for obtaining the measurement. >   > During the presentation however, Malone stated that he strongly > recommended against everybody in the room beginning to perform nuchal > translucency measurements because we weren't qualified.  I personally > was quite offended by this statement because the certificate on my > wall also states that I am qualified in MFM and I am sorry, but a > nuchal translucency measurement is not rocket science... >   > I concur that somebody needs to develop formal > recommendations/guidelines for all to utilize, but when doing so, > don't use this as a means to create some elitist club and imply that I > can't perform the measurement. > Lynn >   >  I applaud Dan for obtaining AIUM, I mean Fetal Medicine Foundation > certification in nuchal translucency screening. It is demanding, > requires significant effort and shows a commitment to quality.

--Boundary_(ID_vXdc9XTcjtUo39aEp0lXdg) Content-type: text/enriched; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

Lynn,

I am suprised by that statement too. I wasn't at the meeting and would have found such a remark to be upsetting. My interpretation is that the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine is trying to develop guidelines and no one else can be qualified to follow their guidelines since they have not been published or shared. The truth is, that I really don't know what he meant, so maybe I shouldn't comment. I think the cat is out of the bag. Few of us are going to wait for the Society's guidelines before offering this service.

Such an elitist tone reminds me of my first encounter with the FMF Theoretical Course and the lab sponsoring it. I wondered how those impeccably dressed world travelers balanced effortlessly on their pedestals.

Gary Kleinman

MFM, Genetics

Bridgeport, CT

On Monday, February 9, 2004, at 11:20 AM, Lynn D. Montgomery, M.D. wrote:

<excerpt>

= <fontfamily><param>Arial</param><color><param>0000,0000,FFFF</param><smaller>Gary,</smaller></color></fontfamily>

= <fontfamily><param>Arial</param><color><param>0000,0000,FFFF</param><smaller>I totally agree with all of your points.  I was at the meeting and amazingly enough, nothing was mentioned at the time of questioning with regard to qualifications for obtaining the measurement.</smaller></color></fontfamily>

 

= <fontfamily><param>Arial</param><color><param>0000,0000,FFFF</param><smaller>During the presentation however, Malone stated that he strongly recommended against everybody in the room beginning to perform nuchal translucency measurements because we weren't qualified.  I personally was quite offended by this statement because the certificate on my wall also states that I am qualified in MFM and I am sorry, but a nuchal translucency measurement is not rocket science...</smaller></color></fontfamily>

 

= <fontfamily><param>Arial</param><color><param>0000,0000,FFFF</param><smaller>I concur that somebody needs to develop formal recommendations/guidelines for all to utilize, but when doing so, don't use this as a means to create some elitist club and imply that I can't perform the measurement.</smaller></color></fontfamily>

= <fontfamily><param>Arial</param><color><param>0000,0000,FFFF</param><smaller>Lynn</smaller></color></fontfamily>

 

 

 

 I applaud Dan for obtaining AIUM, I mean Fetal Medicine Foundation certification in nuchal translucency screening. It is demanding, requires significant effort and shows a commitment to quality.

</excerpt> --Boundary_(ID_vXdc9XTcjtUo39aEp0lXdg)--





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Tue Sep 2 05:00:30 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.