Re: GYN: Residual uterine tissue after subtotal hysterectomy

From: Steve & Eryl Raymond (eryl@intekom.co.za)
Thu Dec 25 10:24:24 2003


What I didn't say was that the reason this subtotal was done was because of difficulty with the cervix, but in the absence of a clear reason why, it is sensible to consider the possibility that difficulty was the case. I know full well that there are more than one reason for a subtotal, including the one that you give. Steve

Larry Glazerman wrote:

> I don’t agree about the reason the subtotal was done. Most of my
> hysters nowadays are supracervical
>
> Larry R. Glazerman, MD, FACOG
>
> Ob-Gyn at Trexlertown, PC
>
> 6900 Hamilton Blvd.
>
> Trexlertown, PA 18087-0060
>
> 610-402-0161
>
> larry.glazerman@lvh.com
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Steve & Eryl Raymond
> Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2003 4:19 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
> Subject: Re: GYN: Residual uterine tissue after subtotal hysterectomy
>
> Yeah, remove it is the right option, but anyone who has ever tried to
> take out the cervix after a subtotal will remember that the subtotal
> was probably done in the first place because it was difficult to get
> at the cervix. Unless there is some pathology in the stump it may not
> be necessary to take it out, and if you are going to put in a
> hysteroscope, you just slide it in under continuous vision watching
> all the time as it advances, thus there shouldn't be a problem about
> what is likely to happen at the fundus of the stump.
> Steve
>
> RModugno@aol.com <mailto:RModugno@aol.com> wrote:
>
> In a message dated 12/24/2003 2:55:52 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> garrys@mindspring.com <mailto:garrys@mindspring.com> writes:
>
> She is pretty much ready to have another surgery, but I've
> suggested the
> above first.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Garry
>
> Re-mooove it!
>
> Robert Modugno MD MBA FACOG
>
>--
>
>S.H. Raymond FRCOG
>
>Principal Specialist
>
>Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
>
>Empangeni Hospital
>
>Private Bag X20005
>
>Empangeni
>
>SOUTH AFRICA 3880
>
>Phone: (+27)-35-9028560
>
>Fax: (+27)-35-7922596
>
>Everyone thinks of changing the world, but no one thinks of changing himself.
>
>Leo Tolstoy (1828-1910)
>

--
S.H. Raymond FRCOG
Principal Specialist
Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Empangeni Hospital
Private Bag X20005
Empangeni
SOUTH AFRICA 3880

Phone: (+27)-35-9028560 Fax: (+27)-35-7922596

Everyone thinks of changing the world, but no one thinks of changing himself. Leo Tolstoy (1828-1910)





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Sat Aug 2 04:42:34 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.