Re: Amazing case!

From: Charlie Chambers (cchamber@gorge.net)
Wed Nov 12 11:14:59 2003


I may have missed this on earlier posts but what was the reasoning for getting the MRI in the first place?

On Wednesday, November 12, 2003, at 07:18 AM, Efrain Ramirez wrote:

> Yeah - worm -like! :)
>
>> At Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Richard Chudacoff, MD wrote:
>>
>> Digital phantoms?
>>
>> --
>> Richard Chudacoff, MD
>>
>> The world is governed by very different personages from
>> what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes.
>> Benjamin Disraeli
>>
>> A Conservative Government is an organized hypocrisy.
>> Benjamin Disraeli
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net]On Behalf Of
>> Efrain
>> Ramirez
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 6:21 AM
>> To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
>> Subject: Re: Amazing case!
>>
>> Late answer - but - amazing indeed - agree with members - one point
>> that
>> stands out - don't trust MRI's for clinical decisions - at least on
>> OB-Gyn -I have seen some case for evaluation of "adnexal mass" on an
>> MRI
>> sent by another MD - just to found to vanish within my fingers on a
>> pelvic examn and not to be found on ultrasounds -
>>
>>> At Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Lynn Montgomery, M.D. wrote:
>>>
>>> Listers,
>>> Lets just say that this is a hypothetical:
>>>
>>> Patient at 26 weeks gestation with five previous cesarean sections -
>>> two
>>> of them classical. Presents with low abdominal pain. MRI shows
>>> what is
>>> interpreted as "thinning of the lower uterine segment with apparent
>>> protrusion of the amniotic membranes through the segment". No
>>> contractions, ongoing pain, no fetal issues.
>>>
>>> What would you do? You can't offend me cause it is only a
>>> hypothetical
>>> and not my hypothetical...
>>> Lynn
>>>
>>> --
>>> Lynn D. Montgomery, M.D.
>>> Rocky Mountain Women's Health
>>> Missoula, Montana
>>>
>>> The information provided here is only an opinion and does not
>>> constitute
>> the establishment of a patient-physician relationship. As with any
>> medical
>> problem, should you feel that you have a significant problem it is
>> incumbent
>> upon you to seek the appropriate medical care. I hope that you will
>> understand that I cannot respond to individual e-mails directed to me.
>>>
>> --
>> "The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement.
>> But the opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound
>> truth."
>>
>> Niels Bohr (1885 - 1962)
>>
>
> --
> "The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement.
> But the opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound
> truth."
>
> Niels Bohr (1885 - 1962)
>
************************************************************************ * Charlie Chambers

--
Hood River, OR
cchamber@alumni.rice.edu

"No matter where you go... there you are." Dr. Buckaroo Banzai ************************************************************************





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 04:36:19 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.