![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
US: Number crunching/practiceFrom: Zachariah Newton (zbnewton@bellsouth.net)Sun Sep 28 18:56:45 2003
The post by Dr, Bradley a while back regarding forced retirement is ominous of service availability across the nation. Viability for any practioner demands positive return for work done. Tangible or intangible. The filtering process of ridding the system of aging practioners with accelerated incompetency is desirable. When the process reduces the pool of competent players on terms of econonic prohibition, there exists a systemic problem. The tolerance level of accepting demands for continuity in professional life has shifted South in an irreversible course. Different values, different rewards. No judgment here, simple statement of fact. There is an inflection point ahead wherein the demands for work and the attached risk exposure exceed the economic cost to achieve possession of credentials to provide the service, compensated on a fair value basis. The service must be provided. It is not possible without appropriate compensation to the providers, relative to alternative pursuits. The trend is toward increase morbidity and mortality before rebalance is achieved. A horrible reality.
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Fri May 2 04:37:17 2008 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.