-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: US malpractice (long) From: DoctorJoe@aol.com Mon Aug 4 07:27:04 2003 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: DoctorJoe@aol.com: "Re: US malpractice (long)" Previous message: deborah stephens: "Re: US malpractice (long)" In a message dated 8/4/03 06:00:44, DSTEPHENS@peacehealth.org writes: > >>From the "legal" and "financial/economic aspect" I can see the logic in a > >high/low ageement. From a potential defendant's view it seems immoral and > >unjust. Why should the plaintiff receive one cent if the jury finds the > >defendant not negligent! > >This is but one of the reasons why we have a professional liability > insurance > >"crisis" in the US today! > > > >Comments? > Next message: DoctorJoe@aol.com: "Re: US malpractice (long)" Previous message: deborah stephens: "Re: US malpractice (long)"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Thu Oct 2 04:44:49 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.