Re: Bitter medicine

From: Gordon (obgyndoc@swbell.net)
Mon Jun 30 17:35:36 2003


Just his opinion, he could be wrong.

--
Gordon

>----- Original Message ----- From: "art fougner, md" <evsono@pipeline.com> To: "Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L" <ob-gyn-l@dns.obgyn.net> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 4:58 PM Subject: Re: Bitter medicine

> U-N-I-O-N > > norma rae > > At Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Myer Bornstein wrote: > > > >But why should an experienced Laparoscopist not be able to practice his > >field and be able to pass on his/hers skills to the younger generation. > >Medicine will implode on it self soon. Then when people are unable to > >received basic care maybe something will be done!!! > > > >-- > >Myer S. Bornstein, MD, MMM, FACOG, FACPE, CPE > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Douglas > >Krell > >Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 12:58 PM > >To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L > >Subject: Re: Bitter medicine > > > >Glenn, > >In what state was your practice? > >If I were you I would be on the Governor's doorstep with a camera and crew > >from a local TV station. > >Another option might be to go into general medical practice. Then your > >insurance might only be 20,000/year. > >Douglas Krell MD FACOG > > > >>From: ENDODOK@aol.com > >>Reply-To: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net > >>To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@dns.obgyn.net> > >>Subject: Re: Bitter medicine > >>Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 11:35:23 -0500 > >> > >> After 32 years of practice, I folded my tent 2 weeks ago. Our > >>former > >>carrier withdrew our coverage. A new carrier was found, but with nose > >>coverage > >>plus the annual premium, the first year premium was $198,000. ( this was > >>reportedly a "mature" policy). This was projected to be a "stable" annual > >>premium, > >>however it raised our practice overhead to 80%, and this was the best > >>scenario our CFO could project. This required a massive cutback in > >>staffing, > >>posssible increased hours of operation etc. As you all know, the projection > > > >>for > >>liability carriers losses is enormous, and the " De facto, insolvancy" of > >>the > >>liabilty industry is a possibility . Do read the lead article in Time ( > >>6/9/03 ). > >>The outlook for improvement in premium rates for physicians is grim. > >> The toll of this decision is profound, and my family is devastated > >>. I > >>was given one day to choose to (1) leave totally medical practice, and tail > >>coverage was free, or (2) accept the new policy with its

unpredictability, > >>and > >>costs. Unless true liability reform occurs, the lack of affordable coverage > > > >>, > >>or the unavailability of any coverage will shut down medical practice as we > >>know it. > >> > >>J.Glenn Bradley MD > > > > -- > art fougner, md > ich bin ein New Yorker >





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Fri May 2 04:36:51 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.