Re: failed methotrexate solved!!!

From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com)
Tue Jun 13 07:51:59 2000


can't help with the prior negs but this case illustrates the old adage - "before calling the repairman, first check the plug."

glad things worked out ok.

art

At Mon, 12 Jun 2000, Shayne wrote: >
>Thank YOU for your help esp those who suggested the assay problem... I
>had excluded that on the basis of her prior neg serum beta's the
>explanation I received from our lab can be found below. I still am
>unsure why she has previous neg results
>Shayne Mora Bellingham Wa
>
>Dear Dr.Mora,
>Your patient N.Z. had quantitative hCG levels run at our laboratory
>using
>the Abbott Axsym Total B-hCG assay (Abbott list number 7A59). This
>assay
>uses a monoclonal mouse capture antibody and goat polyclonal tag
>antibody,
>with bovine and goat serum in the sample diluent to block interference
>from
>anti-goat antibodies that may be present in the patient sample.
>
>Coll. Date mIU/mL hCG Interp
>5/27/98 5 Equivocal
>6/1/98 3 Negative
>6/9/98 2 Negative
>8/25/98 2 Negative
>10/26/98 2 Negative
>3/31/00 153 Positive
>4/3/00 143 Positive
>4/7/00 43 Positive
>4/14/00 60 Positive
>4/17/00 90 Positive
>4/20/00 74 Positive
>4/25/00 81 Positive
>4/28/00 97 Positive
>5/2/00 94 Positive
>5/4/00 70 Positive
>5/10/00 61 Positive
>5/17/00 46 Positive
>5/25/00 59 Positive
>5/30/00 87 Positive
>6/2/00 60 Positive
>6/9/00 60 Positive
>
>I was able to retrieve the last two serum samples from refrigerated
>storage
>and test them with the Hybritech ICON II qualitative hCG assay
>(distributed
>by Beckman-Coulter) utilizing mouse monoclonal antibodies for both
>capture
>and tag. The results were negative at the stated 25 mIU/mL sensitivity
>of
>the test. This is a visually read test and there did not appear to be
>any
>hCG reactivity, which in my experience indicates <10 mIU/mL hCG even
>though
>the FDA-approved sensitivity is listed as 25 mIU/mL.
>Hybritech
>Coll. Date mIU/mL hCG Interp
>6/2/00 <25 Negative
>6/9/00 <25 Negative
>
>I also performed some experiments on these two samples using the Abbott
>Axsym instrument and reagents used to generate the original results. In
>one
>experiment, I used the instrument's on-board dilution capability to use
>the
>reagent kit's specimen diluent to perform a 1:10 dilution. In another, I
>used specimen diluent taken from an Abbott Axsym CK-MB kit containing
>goat
>serum to perform a manual 1:2 dilution of N.Z.'s last two serum samples:
>
>Coll. Date mIU/mL hCG, neat mIU/mL hCG, on-board 1:10 dilution
>mIU/mL hCG, x2 dilution with goat serum
>6/2/00 60 Undetectable, <2 mIU/mL
>Undetectable, <2 mIU/ML
>6/9/00 60 Undetectable, <2 mIU/mL
>Undetectable, <2 mIU/ML
>
>The patients serum was tested for Rheumatoid Factor (one possible cause
>of
>false positive immunoassays) and found to be negative. It therefore
>appears
>to be highly probable that the patient's false-positive hCG levels were
>caused by heterophile and/or anti-goat antibodies in her serum present
>in
>excess of the capacity of the specimen diluent's ability to block it.
>The
>mechanism for this interference is unknown -- it seems improbable that
>an
>antibody to the tagged goat anti-hCG would cause it to bind to the
>capture
>antibody or otherwise prevent it from being washed away with the unbound
>tag. Nevertheless, if you add enough goat serum the interference goes
>away,
>so anti-goat antibodies in the patient serum are the most likely
>suspect.
>
>This sort of case was recently in the news:
>http://www.postintelligencer.com/local/canc19.shtml
>
>All immunoassays are subject to this same interference. Just within the
>past
>month, customers using a competitor's assay (Roche) were warned of a
>similar
>problem: http://www.biofind.com/rumor/rumor_viewmessage.asp?msg_idA302
>
>We saw some problems with our Troponin assay (but not hCG at that point)
>and
>sent this announcement to all the physician offices last November:
> <<Chem Link 13 Lipase&interference.doc>>
>
>Thank you for bringing this case to our attention. I will be discussing
>it
>with our medical director tomorrow. Please give me a call if you have
>any
>further questions or concerns.
>
>Gary Sandberg MT(ASCP) SC
>Chemistry supervisor
>NorthWest Regional Laboratory
>St.Joseph Hospital
>Bellingham, WA
>738-6330 x2961

--
art fougner, md

A series of 1000 cases begins with but a single anecdote.





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Thu Oct 2 04:36:10 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.