-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: Blood loss at Cesarean versus vaginal birth From: Bernard Cristalli (bcrist@club-internet.fr) Mon Jun 12 11:03:30 2000 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Lisa Millman: "Third Annual Yale Conference on Women's Health and Fitness" Previous message: Marco A. Pelosi, III, MD, FACOG, FACS, FICS: "ICS-US MEETING ANNOUNCEMENT: Boston, 7/25-29, 28 CMEs" In reply to: DoctorJoe@aol.com: "Re: Blood loss at Cesarean versus vaginal birth" Next in thread: Braun, R. Daniel: "Re: Blood loss at Cesarean versus vaginal birth" 'gonna do it. let me the time to read the initial post :-) -- Bernard Cristalli MD AMACOG AIHP - ACCA Paris France Bernard.Cristalli@CliniquedelEssonne.fr http://www.CliniquedelEssonne.fr http://www.obgyn.net/corresp/cristalli.htm http://www.gyneweb.fr '64 Mk2 3.8 > De : DoctorJoe@aol.com > Répondre à : ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net > Date : Mon, 12 Jun 2000 09:25:36 -0500 > À : Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@forum.obgyn.net> > Objet : Re: Blood loss at Cesarean versus vaginal birth > > In a message dated 6/12/00 8:13:15 AM, RModugno@aol.com writes: > >> CONCLUSION: Our findings >> demonstrate that blood loss during vaginal delivery with episiotomy is >> >> greater than during cesarean section and affirms the determining role of >> >> forceps use in association with episiotomy in this blood loss. Clinical >> >> assessment of blood loss at delivery lacks precision. > > Yeah, but don't the French automatically do things different from Anglos? > (For example, Londoners burn their meat - Texans even worse - and Parisians > eat it raw. Etc, etc.) Wouldn't we expect just the opposite in a French study > than one done in the U.K. or the U.S.? > > Joe P. > > <BITING HIS TONGUE AND WAITING FOR BERNARD TO ANSWER!!!> > Next message: Lisa Millman: "Third Annual Yale Conference on Women's Health and Fitness" Previous message: Marco A. Pelosi, III, MD, FACOG, FACS, FICS: "ICS-US MEETING ANNOUNCEMENT: Boston, 7/25-29, 28 CMEs" In reply to: DoctorJoe@aol.com: "Re: Blood loss at Cesarean versus vaginal birth" Next in thread: Braun, R. Daniel: "Re: Blood loss at Cesarean versus vaginal birth"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Tue Sep 2 04:50:40 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.