|
Re: adhesion question
From: Linda (anonymous@obgyn.net)
Wed Jan 6 17:21:39 1999
Ohhhh, so that's exactly what that means. Okay, I've had that done
too. I just wanted to make sure that I understand everything and that
I'm not missing out on another treatment option.
Huggles,
Linda in NV
---"Christine M. Smith" <anonymous@obgyn.net> wrote:
>
> At Wed, 6 Jan 1999, Linda wrote:
> >
> >In reading the Endo Sourcebook more indepth than I can admit to in
the
> >past, it says that adhesions should be REMOVED and not just cut. I
> >find this interesting. Can anyone provide their experiences with
> >having adhesions *removed* versus just having them *cut* and whether
> >you feel painfree since having this done?
> >
> >Linda
> >Reno, NV
> >
> >Hi!
>
> I read that there was a certain way of cutting them so that they do
not
> grow back together again. My surgeon referred to
> the procedure as "taking down" the adhesions, although the official
term
> on the OR schedule was "lysis of adhesions."
>
> Chris S.
>
|
|
![[ endo@obgyn.net ]](../../images/endo_at_obgyn.gif)