![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
Re: getting worse???From: Michelle (anonymous@obgyn.net)Mon Apr 30 02:00:31 2007
Hello, My first surgery was when I was 18. No one wanted to believe that my cramps were that bad so the surgey was halfhearted. Still she found it and burned some of it off. At 21, I had laparotomy to remove a 12cm endometrioma and two 5cm cysts and adhesions. This doctor did all she could. She excised what she saw. However, she told me she would check my intestines but I didn't have any bowel prep.? Some of the pain improved greatly, but some things didn't change. At 26, last month, I had my third (and I hope final). The endo was not severe in the areas I expected (no frozen uterus or cul-de-sac adhesions at all) but I had invasive endo on the bowels requiring resections. This explained why I was having more problems with intestinal cramping than bad cramps. This time I saw an endo specialist and once again I had endo removed from all the usual lower pelvic areas, but the intestinal areas were the much more invasive lesions plus some stuff on the bladder area that I never had before. I am not sure how to answer your question in the end. I think it depends on how long lesions go unnoticed and how well any surgeries were done. I think it takes some time for some of the lesions to develop into the kinds most surgeons recognize. If missed or not removed all the way, they will finally get to the point of causing pain and other problems again. For me, it wasn't so much that it was worse, it was just that the each surgery was different in in its own way. This is an interesting question as I know many of us have wondered about this. I wonder what others will say.
-- Michelle
|
|
Return to ![]()
Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 03:57:46 2009
Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote
home | medical professionals | women | industry | forums | international