|
Re: Breast Enlargement!!!!!!!!!
From: Stephy (anonymous@obgyn.net)
Wed Nov 26 23:21:13 2003
I was wondering if anyone has found some way to increase their breast
size safely and permanently. I am a 34 AA, I would like to be at least
an A or B. I have no intention of getting implants and have tried
herbal pills such as "Bloussant and "Breast Success", and have had no
success. I have also tried the computerized suction bra called "Brava"
for 36 weeks, that's 26 weeks longer than the suggested minimum time.
Nothing. It was quite uncomfortable. I don't know if "Brava" works for
other woman, but it didn't do anything for me. If anyone has found
anything that works, please let me know.
At Thu, 1 Oct 1998, Lorianne wrote:
>
>Both you ladies have had me giggling so hard. I just love the way we can be
>so open with each other. I was thinking of that song that goes: (Hopefully
>some of you know the tune that goes along with these lyrics.)
>Do your boobs hang low? Do they wobble to and fro? Can you tie them in a
>knot? Can you tie them in a bow? Can you through them over your shoulder
>like a continental soldier? Do your boobs hang low?
>I send this with affectionate humor. My grandmother (of all people) taught
>me this diddy; she had enormous breasts that I loved to cuddle against.
>
>But seriously, I wanted to let you know something I felt was important since
>it is obvious some of us do not know which hormones promote breast
>development. Ortho Cyclen does not contain progesterone (C21 H30 O2); it
>does however contain a synthetic progestin compound called Norgestimate.
>This is not the compound responsible for the breast cell multiplication some
>of us have been experiencing on BCPs, Oral Contraceptives (OC) as referred
>to by the medical community.
>
>It is the Ethinyl Estradiol synthetic estrogenic compound that is
>influencing the breast development. The natural estradiol (E2) that is
>manufactured in our bodies is the estrogen that is the most stimulating to
>breast tissue as well as to endometrial tissues. Estradiol (natural and
>most particularly synthetic... read below) is considered a contraindication
>for women who have a risk of breast or endometrial cancer because of this
>rapid cell-division action it provides.
>
>Synthetic ethinyl estradiol, commonly used in estrogen supplements and
>contraceptives, is even more of a cancer risk than the natural estradiol
>because it is efficiently absorbed by mouth and slow to be metabolized and
>excreted. The longer a synthetic estrogen stays inside the body, the more
>opportunity it has to do damage.
>
>In light of this info I discovered by surfing and reading, I wonder why an
>informed woman with endo would want to take it? More importantly why a
>doctor would prescribe this to a woman with endo? There may be something
>else I could not find. Perhaps there is something more I do not know about.
>However, I looked very hard these past three days for good news. You see,
>I'm highly motivated to try to get back the breast tissue I lost during my
>Danocrine therapy. And I'm looking at many biochemical means as well as
>surgical options. (Mostly because, although Lupron does not list breast
>reduction as a side effect, I've lost even more tissue since using it this
>year. And nursing three babies four years in a row didn't help either. But
>the fact remains that the 36 C+ (I spilled out of the bra) I once had before
>the Danocrine went down to a something less than a 36 B. (using a slightly
>padded bra, without push up things) After nursing three children, I became a
>36 A with a little to spare. After a month of Lupron I was a 34 A and still
>decreasing. I finally stopped wearing bras. I bought a bra and panty set
>yesterday; the bra is 34AA and fits perfectly. So, can you understand how
>upset I am about losing so much of my femininity?
>
>Do you see how motivated I was to find good news regarding Ortho Cyclen?
>But I did also look at the PDR warnings, cautions, contraindications and
>adverse reactions of these two ingredients that make up Ortho-Cyclen and was
>appalled. All this info is available through the Internet by searching
>under the compound names. Searching under the brand name also helps, but
>doesn't always get all the sites that offer abstracts and biochemistry.
>
>Everything I found on the http://www confirmed what Dr. Kamen, Dr. Wright and Dr.
>Lee has each written in their books on hormone balance. I'm feeling so
>depressed. But at least I'm free of physical pain. My heart is still
>broken. I miss my breasts so much. Well, I must go now, I'm starting to
>really cry hard now.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: anonymous@obgyn.net [mailto:anonymous@obgyn.net On Behalf Of Dragon Lady -
>Mistress of Magic
>Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 1998 4:44 PM
>To: Multiple recipients of list
>Subject: Re: Breast Enlargement!!!!!!!!!
>
>>Tricia:
>>
>>They don't hurt, thank God. I would really be in a mess if they did.
>>Ortho-Cyclens do have a higher progesterone percentage. Maybe that is
>>what is causing this. I just hope it stops soon, bras are not cheap.
>>
>>Chandra
>>Manassas, VA
>>mrscmartin@hotmail.com
>>
>Consider yourself lucky then....Mine hurt like an SOB....like someone
>took my nipples, stretched them out a mile and let them SNAP back...
>
>I belive it could be teh progesterone....that helps the body simulate
>pregnancy....good news is, I would expect then that it would settle
>down by the end of the third month (following the first trimester
>symptoms of pregnancy)
>
>Good luck....
>
>Tricia
>
>--
>=====================================================
>= Patricia Rawski=== === prawski@emunix.emich.edu = =================== == rawski@online.emich.edu = ===================================================
>=================== nethack addict ==================
>
|
|
![[ endo@obgyn.net ]](../../images/endo_at_obgyn.gif)