![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
Re: oops! posted twice. Sorry!From: Annie (anonymous@obgyn.net)Fri Oct 11 17:28:50 2002
At Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Annie wrote: > >Good afternoon, > >Last Wednesday I had laparoscopy for pelvic pain dating back to Feb. I >became pregnant May 31st, miscarried Aug. 1st. I had a d&c that day, >and another on Aug. 22nd for retained products. I was also treated for >infection between those two dates. My pelvic pain disappeared during my >pregnancy and returned about 2 weeks after my loss. I have been on >narcotic meds since then. After my lap I was diagnosed with mild endo, >and my appendix was taken out because "old endo was wrapped around it". >(so says the general surgery post-op report) There was also some "powder >burns" cauterized from deep inside the cul-de-sac, and also some powder >burns on the left ureter and left uterine artery that they did not >cauterize, too much danger of hemmorhage or stripping. The pathology >report came back today and it showed that there was no endometriosis, >but that I did have mild appendicitis. WHAT NOW? I mean I dont >understand how the gyn. surgeon can see obvious powder burns where he >did, and cauterize them, and say that old endo was wrapped around my >appendix, and then it isnt endo? What could it be? I have been told that >adhesions would NOT be caused by the 2 d&c's that I had in August. I >did have hernia surgery when I was 6 weeks old, almost 26 years ago. And >wouldnt it have been more obvious that it was adhesions rather than >endo? I am so confused, and now nervous as to what it could be. I am >going to post this over on the general womens message board also, but if >anyone here has ANY words of wisdom they would be greatly appreciated! I >have a call in to my gyn's office, but it being Friday afternoon I dont >think I will get a call back until Monday. > >Thanks for reading, >
-- Annie W. annie_01976@yahoo.com
|
|
Return to ![]()
Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Fri Jan 2 03:39:04 2009