![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: microcalcifications
From: Hannah (anonymous@obgyn.net)
Wed, 5 Dec 2001 12:03:43 -0500 (EST)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Hannah: "Re: Lump and Arm Pain"
- Previous message: Hannah: "Re: Breast sensitivity"
- Maybe in reply to: Deborah: "microcalcifications"
- Next in thread: Deborah: "Re: microcalcifications"
- Reply: Deborah: "Re: microcalcifications"
Dear Deborah- Microcalcifications are sometimes an indication of early breast cancer when seen on a mammogram. Most of the time, they are there due to aging, old injury, old infection , or other benign causes. It sounds as if the proper evaluation of these microcalcifications was performed and there is nothing to pursue at this time. This is assuming all tests are stable. There are rare instances in which very slow growing breast cancers do not appear as a change on the mammogram for many years. You should not be overly concerned simply because the insurance requires additional information. If you or your doctor are concerned about the calcifications and would rather not watch and wait, sometimes for years, then you can see about getting a tissue diagnosis. This may be easily done with stereotactic (non surgical)biopsy; the best person to advise you regarding this type of biopsy would be a radiologist or surgeon who performs the procedure. Hannah Brooks, MD,FACS------------------ Reply Separator -------------------- Originally From: anonymous@medispecialty.com (Deborah Haight) ------------------ Reply Separator -------------------- Subject: microcalcifications ------------------ Reply Separator -------------------- Date: 12/03/2001 02:17pm
I have a question about microcalcifications. I had a abnormal mamogram about 22 months ago and was called back to have a cone view taken of one breast. I was told at this time that the miocrocalcifications were probably beign and I should resume my normal schedule of annual mamograms. Because I was still somewhat nervous about this My Dr at the time order a repeat cone view of the same breast 6 months later at my request not a medical reason. I was told they were stable probably beign and to resume my normal schedule of mamograms. I had another one 6 months later of both breasts to get back on schedule and was told that the calcifications remained stable and everything was fine. Due again in Feb 2002. I was okay with this until last week when due to a job change we needed to buy personal insurance instead of group and was told that my breast needed to ridered due to calcifications. Question is this really that much of a concern as far as developing cancer. They have me concerned.
- Next message: Hannah: "Re: Lump and Arm Pain"
- Previous message: Hannah: "Re: Breast sensitivity"
- Maybe in reply to: Deborah: "microcalcifications"
- Next in thread: Deborah: "Re: microcalcifications"
- Reply: Deborah: "Re: microcalcifications"
Return to ![]()
Mail a New Message to the Forum: breast-health@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Sat Jan 26 12:29:26 2008
Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote
home | medical professionals | women | industry | forums | international
e-mail | about us | advertising | our sponsors | contact us | disclaimer |
This information is provided for educational purposes only.
Please read the disclaimer. ©1996-2008, all rights reserved.
Do not reproduce without permission of MediSpecialty.com